ISA 570 · Technology Startups

Going Concern Checklist for Technology Startups

Tailored going concern assessment for technology startups and scale-ups. Covers industry-specific indicators including cash runway, funding pipeline, burn rate trajectory, and revenue milestone achievement.

ISA 570FreeNo login

Going Concern
Checklist.

Session
0x4DB9
FY End
not set
Currency
€
engagement.conf
indicators.list
README.md
01// engagement_context— ISA 570.3
02entity_name=
03fy_end=
04expected_auth_date=
05entity_type=
06initial_engagement=
07currency=
08// indicators— ISA 570.A2–A7 (0/21 selected)
No indicatorsscore: 0awaiting selection0/21 indicators
✓highfinNet liability or net current liability position
✓highfinFixed-term borrowings approaching maturity without realistic refinancing prospects
✓highfinLoan covenant breaches or indications that financial support may be withdrawn
✓highfinSubstantial operating losses or significant deterioration in the value of assets
✓mediumfinArrears or discontinuance of dividends
✓mediumfinInability to pay creditors on due dates
✓mediumfinAdverse key financial ratios
✓mediumfinNegative operating cash flows indicated by historical or prospective financial statements
✓highopeManagement intentions to liquidate the entity or cease operations
✓highopeLoss of key management or personnel without replacement
✓highopeLoss of a major market, franchise, licence, or principal supplier
✓mediumopeLabour difficulties or shortages of important supplies
✓mediumopeFundamental changes in market or technology that the entity cannot adapt to
✓lowopeDependence on the success of a particular project
✓highothLegal proceedings or regulatory action that may result in claims the entity cannot meet
✓highothChanges in law or regulation expected to adversely affect the entity
✓mediumothNon-compliance with capital or other statutory requirements
✓mediumothCatastrophic loss of a major asset
✓lowothExcessive dependence on short-term borrowings to fund long-term assets
✓mediumothBusiness interruption from cyber attacks or IT system failure
✓mediumothExposure to climate-related physical or transition risks threatening the business model
15// events_conditions_rationale— ISA 570.10–11 · independent identification
16auditor.identification=
17management.own_list=
Events & conditions · independent identification (ISA 570.10–11)
20// management_assessment— ISA 570.12–15 · evaluate management's assessment
21period_end=must be ≥12m from FS date
22method=
23key_assumptions=
24data_reliability=
Management's assessment · period + method + data reliability
27// management_plans— ISA 570.16 · feasibility + intent & ability
No plans documented. Add management's plans (asset sale, refinancing, equity raise, cost reduction, etc.) with per-plan feasibility assessment.
Management's plans · feasibility (intent AND ability)
35// cash_flow_stress_test— ISA 570.16(c) · runway scenarios
Enter monthly burn rate to run cash flow stress test.
Cash flow stress test · runway scenarios
45// sensitivity_analysis— what-if additional indicators
Select indicators to run sensitivity.
Sensitivity · what-if indicator escalation
50// risk_heat_map— category × severity
Select indicators to generate heat map.
Risk heat map · category × severity
55// material_uncertainty— ISA 570.18–20 · three-step determination
56basis_appropriate=
is GC basis of accounting appropriate?
57uncertainty_level=
58reasoning=
59stand_back_assessment=
Material uncertainty · three-step determination + stand-back
62// disclosure_adequacy— ISA 570.19 · financial statement note
✓
Going concern basis of accounting is appropriate based on audit evidence obtainedISA 570.19
✓
Material uncertainty (if any) is adequately disclosed in the financial statementsISA 570.20
✓
Principal events or conditions giving rise to doubt are specifically describedISA 570.20(a)
✓
Management’s plans to address the uncertainty are disclosedISA 570.20(b)
✓
Financial statements include explicit statement that material uncertainty existsISA 570.21
✓
Auditor’s report includes ‘Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern’ sectionISA 570.22
✓
If disclosure is inadequate, a qualified or adverse opinion is consideredISA 570.23
✓
Written representations obtained on going concern assessment completenessISA 580.10(e)
70proposed_disclosure_text=
Disclosure adequacy · ISA 570.19 + proposed text
75// audit_report_decision— ISA 570.21–24 · report form
76report_decision=
77rationale=
tcwg_communication (ISA 570.25)
78
79key_points_communicated=
Audit report decision + TCWG communication
85// isa_570_revised_readiness— effective Dec 2026 · 2024 revisions
✓
Enhanced risk assessment for going concern events and conditions
Structured identification process for events and conditions, applied regardless of initial risk assessment.
✓
Evaluate management’s intent AND ability to execute mitigating plans
Both intent and ability must be separately assessed and documented.
✓
Mandatory going concern section in all auditor’s reports
A dedicated GC section is required even when no material uncertainty exists.
✓
Explicit stand-back assessment at the end of audit fieldwork
Stand back and consider all evidence obtained that is relevant to going concern before forming a conclusion.
✓
Enhanced transparency about going concern work in auditor’s report
Greater detail about procedures performed and conclusions reached.
✓
Professional skepticism documented at each stage, not just in conclusions
Evidence of skeptical questioning of management assumptions must appear throughout working papers.
ISA 570 (Revised) 2024 readiness checklist
awaiting selection·0/21 indicators · score 0private
01weighted_score
total—
02assessment_level
level—
03indicators
selected—
04high_severity
count—
CONTEXTUAL INTELLIGENCE — 1 warning
ℹ ISA 570.10
No indicators identified. ISA 570.10 still requires documentation that going concern was considered. Ensure working papers record the basis for this nil conclusion, including the information sources reviewed.
EXPORT (EMAIL TO UNLOCK)

Email unlocks the free download.

No payment required. Unlock above to download the full working paper.

Format
HTML → PDF
Pages
4–8
Price
FREE
or CtrlE

Going concern assessment: Technology Startups

Technology startups operate in a fundamentally different going concern paradigm from established businesses: they are expected to burn cash. The going concern assessment is not about profitability but about whether the entity has sufficient runway to reach the next funding milestone, achieve profitability, or otherwise sustain operations. This makes cash runway analysis and funding pipeline assessment the central focus.

Key risk factors: Technology Startups

Key technology startup going concern indicators include: cash runway of less than 12 months without committed additional funding, failure to achieve key product or revenue milestones required for the next funding round, declining venture capital market conditions making fundraising uncertain, unsustainable customer acquisition costs (CAC) relative to customer lifetime value (LTV), key employee departures that could delay product development or undermine investor confidence, and absence of a credible path to profitability or further funding.

Cash runway calculation — this is the single most important assessment. Calculate months of cash remaining at the current burn rate, and also at an accelerated burn rate if growth investment is continuing.

Funding pipeline — assess whether the next funding round is committed, in term sheet stage, or purely speculative. Only committed funding (signed term sheets with closing conditions substantially met) should be treated as probable.

Burn rate trajectory — is the monthly cash burn increasing, stable, or decreasing? An increasing burn rate shortens runway faster than a linear projection suggests.

Revenue milestone achievement — many startups need to demonstrate traction (ARR targets, user growth, unit economics) to secure the next funding round. Assess whether these milestones are achievable.

Customer concentration — early-stage companies often depend on a small number of early adopters. Loss of one or two key customers can simultaneously destroy revenue and undermine the fundraising narrative.

Management's contingency plans — what can management actually cut to extend runway? Assess the credibility of cost reduction scenarios and whether they would impair the business beyond recovery.

Frequently asked questions

What are the key going concern risk factors for technology startups?
Key technology startup going concern indicators include: cash runway of less than 12 months without committed additional funding, failure to achieve key product or revenue milestones required for the next funding round, declining venture capital market conditions making fundraising uncertain, unsustainable customer acquisition costs (CAC) relative to customer lifetime value (LTV), key employee departures that could delay product development or undermine investor confidence, and absence of a credible path to profitability or further funding.
What should auditors consider when assessing going concern for technology startups?
Cash runway calculation — this is the single most important assessment. Calculate months of cash remaining at the current burn rate, and also at an accelerated burn rate if growth investment is continuing. Funding pipeline — assess whether the next funding round is committed, in term sheet stage, or purely speculative. Only committed funding (signed term sheets with closing conditions substantially met) should be treated as probable. Burn rate trajectory — is the monthly cash burn increasing, stable, or decreasing? An increasing burn rate shortens runway faster than a linear projection suggests. Revenue milestone achievement — many startups need to demonstrate traction (ARR targets, user growth, unit economics) to secure the next funding round. Assess whether these milestones are achievable. Customer concentration — early-stage companies often depend on a small number of early adopters. Loss of one or two key customers can simultaneously destroy revenue and undermine the fundraising narrative. Management's contingency plans — what can management actually cut to extend runway? Assess the credibility of cost reduction scenarios and whether they would impair the business beyond recovery.
What is the ISA 570 going concern assessment period?
The going concern assessment must cover at least 12 months from the date the financial statements are expected to be authorised for issue, not from the balance sheet date. This distinction matters: for entities with a long time between year-end and signing, the assessment period may extend significantly into the future.

Other industry checklists

General Manufacturing Retail Construction Hospitality Real Estate Energy Healthcare Non-Profit Agriculture

Related audit tools

Financial Ratio Calculator Analytical Review Tool Materiality Calculator IAS 36 Impairment Calculator

Further reading

Get practical audit insights, weekly.

No exam theory. Just what makes audits run faster.

290+ guides published20 free toolsBuilt by practicing auditors

No spam. We’re auditors, not marketers.