ISA 570 · Agriculture

Going Concern Checklist for Agriculture

Tailored going concern assessment for agricultural entities. Covers industry-specific indicators including harvest risk, commodity price exposure, subsidy dependency, and biological asset impairment.

ISA 570FreeNo login

Going Concern
Checklist.

Session
0x0615
FY End
not set
Currency
engagement.conf
indicators.list
README.md
01// engagement_context— ISA 570.3
02entity_name=
03fy_end=
04expected_auth_date=
05entity_type=
06initial_engagement=
07currency=
08// indicators— ISA 570.A2–A7 (0/21 selected)
No indicatorsscore: 0awaiting selection0/21 indicators
highfinNet liability or net current liability position
highfinFixed-term borrowings approaching maturity without realistic refinancing prospects
highfinLoan covenant breaches or indications that financial support may be withdrawn
highfinSubstantial operating losses or significant deterioration in the value of assets
mediumfinArrears or discontinuance of dividends
mediumfinInability to pay creditors on due dates
mediumfinAdverse key financial ratios
mediumfinNegative operating cash flows indicated by historical or prospective financial statements
highopeManagement intentions to liquidate the entity or cease operations
highopeLoss of key management or personnel without replacement
highopeLoss of a major market, franchise, licence, or principal supplier
mediumopeLabour difficulties or shortages of important supplies
mediumopeFundamental changes in market or technology that the entity cannot adapt to
lowopeDependence on the success of a particular project
highothLegal proceedings or regulatory action that may result in claims the entity cannot meet
highothChanges in law or regulation expected to adversely affect the entity
mediumothNon-compliance with capital or other statutory requirements
mediumothCatastrophic loss of a major asset
lowothExcessive dependence on short-term borrowings to fund long-term assets
mediumothBusiness interruption from cyber attacks or IT system failure
mediumothExposure to climate-related physical or transition risks threatening the business model
15// events_conditions_rationale— ISA 570.10–11 · independent identification
16auditor.identification=
17management.own_list=
Events & conditions · independent identification (ISA 570.10–11)
20// management_assessment— ISA 570.12–15 · evaluate management's assessment
21period_end=must be ≥12m from FS date
22method=
23key_assumptions=
24data_reliability=
Management's assessment · period + method + data reliability
27// management_plans— ISA 570.16 · feasibility + intent & ability
No plans documented. Add management's plans (asset sale, refinancing, equity raise, cost reduction, etc.) with per-plan feasibility assessment.
Management's plans · feasibility (intent AND ability)
35// cash_flow_stress_test— ISA 570.16(c) · runway scenarios
Enter monthly burn rate to run cash flow stress test.
Cash flow stress test · runway scenarios
45// sensitivity_analysis— what-if additional indicators
Select indicators to run sensitivity.
Sensitivity · what-if indicator escalation
50// risk_heat_map— category × severity
Select indicators to generate heat map.
Risk heat map · category × severity
55// material_uncertainty— ISA 570.18–20 · three-step determination
56basis_appropriate=
is GC basis of accounting appropriate?
57uncertainty_level=
58reasoning=
59stand_back_assessment=
Material uncertainty · three-step determination + stand-back
62// disclosure_adequacy— ISA 570.19 · financial statement note
Going concern basis of accounting is appropriate based on audit evidence obtainedISA 570.19
Material uncertainty (if any) is adequately disclosed in the financial statementsISA 570.20
Principal events or conditions giving rise to doubt are specifically describedISA 570.20(a)
Management’s plans to address the uncertainty are disclosedISA 570.20(b)
Financial statements include explicit statement that material uncertainty existsISA 570.21
Auditor’s report includes ‘Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern’ sectionISA 570.22
If disclosure is inadequate, a qualified or adverse opinion is consideredISA 570.23
Written representations obtained on going concern assessment completenessISA 580.10(e)
70proposed_disclosure_text=
Disclosure adequacy · ISA 570.19 + proposed text
75// audit_report_decision— ISA 570.21–24 · report form
76report_decision=
77rationale=
tcwg_communication (ISA 570.25)
78
79key_points_communicated=
Audit report decision + TCWG communication
85// isa_570_revised_readiness— effective Dec 2026 · 2024 revisions
Enhanced risk assessment for going concern events and conditions
Structured identification process for events and conditions, applied regardless of initial risk assessment.
Evaluate management’s intent AND ability to execute mitigating plans
Both intent and ability must be separately assessed and documented.
Mandatory going concern section in all auditor’s reports
A dedicated GC section is required even when no material uncertainty exists.
Explicit stand-back assessment at the end of audit fieldwork
Stand back and consider all evidence obtained that is relevant to going concern before forming a conclusion.
Enhanced transparency about going concern work in auditor’s report
Greater detail about procedures performed and conclusions reached.
Professional skepticism documented at each stage, not just in conclusions
Evidence of skeptical questioning of management assumptions must appear throughout working papers.
ISA 570 (Revised) 2024 readiness checklist
awaiting selection·0/21 indicators · score 0private
01weighted_score
total
02assessment_level
level
03indicators
selected
04high_severity
count
CONTEXTUAL INTELLIGENCE — 1 warning
ISA 570.10
No indicators identified. ISA 570.10 still requires documentation that going concern was considered. Ensure working papers record the basis for this nil conclusion, including the information sources reviewed.
EXPORT (EMAIL TO UNLOCK)

Email unlocks the free download.

No payment required. Unlock above to download the full working paper.

Format
HTML → PDF
Pages
4–8
Price
FREE
or CtrlE

Going concern assessment: Agriculture

Agricultural entities are exposed to a unique combination of biological risk (crop failure, disease, adverse weather), market risk (commodity price volatility), and policy risk (subsidy changes, trade restrictions). Many agricultural businesses operate with thin margins and high seasonal cash flow concentration — the entire year's income may depend on a single harvest. This makes the going concern assessment particularly sensitive to timing and forward-looking assumptions.

Key risk factors: Agriculture

Key agricultural going concern indicators include: consecutive harvest failures or significant yield reductions, commodity prices sustained below the entity's cost of production, changes in government subsidies (such as CAP reform) that reduce guaranteed income, disease outbreaks requiring herd culling or crop destruction, inability to service agricultural debt (particularly seasonal operating loans), and declining land values that erode collateral for secured lending.

Harvest and yield risk — assess the entity's historical yield variability and whether crop insurance or government compensation schemes provide adequate protection against a catastrophic harvest failure.

Commodity price exposure — model the entity's cash flows at current market prices, not historical averages. Assess whether the entity uses forward contracts or hedging to protect against price declines.

Subsidy dependency — calculate what percentage of the entity's income comes from government subsidies. If subsidies are under review or reform, model the impact of reduction or elimination.

Seasonal lending — agricultural entities typically draw on seasonal credit facilities to fund planting and production, repaid from harvest proceeds. Assess whether lenders have committed to renew these facilities.

Biological asset risk — disease outbreaks, pest infestations, or adverse weather can destroy biological assets. Assess the entity's risk mitigation (insurance, diversification, geographic spread).

Land value trends — many agricultural entities use land as collateral. Declining land values can trigger LTV breaches and restrict access to additional borrowing for working capital.

Frequently asked questions

What are the key going concern risk factors for agriculture?
Key agricultural going concern indicators include: consecutive harvest failures or significant yield reductions, commodity prices sustained below the entity's cost of production, changes in government subsidies (such as CAP reform) that reduce guaranteed income, disease outbreaks requiring herd culling or crop destruction, inability to service agricultural debt (particularly seasonal operating loans), and declining land values that erode collateral for secured lending.
What should auditors consider when assessing going concern for agriculture?
Harvest and yield risk — assess the entity's historical yield variability and whether crop insurance or government compensation schemes provide adequate protection against a catastrophic harvest failure. Commodity price exposure — model the entity's cash flows at current market prices, not historical averages. Assess whether the entity uses forward contracts or hedging to protect against price declines. Subsidy dependency — calculate what percentage of the entity's income comes from government subsidies. If subsidies are under review or reform, model the impact of reduction or elimination. Seasonal lending — agricultural entities typically draw on seasonal credit facilities to fund planting and production, repaid from harvest proceeds. Assess whether lenders have committed to renew these facilities. Biological asset risk — disease outbreaks, pest infestations, or adverse weather can destroy biological assets. Assess the entity's risk mitigation (insurance, diversification, geographic spread). Land value trends — many agricultural entities use land as collateral. Declining land values can trigger LTV breaches and restrict access to additional borrowing for working capital.
What is the ISA 570 going concern assessment period?
The going concern assessment must cover at least 12 months from the date the financial statements are expected to be authorised for issue, not from the balance sheet date. This distinction matters: for entities with a long time between year-end and signing, the assessment period may extend significantly into the future.

Get practical audit insights, weekly.

No exam theory. Just what makes audits run faster.

290+ guides published20 free toolsBuilt by practicing auditors

No spam. We’re auditors, not marketers.