IAS 37 · Construction

IAS 37 Provision Calculator
for Construction

Pre-configured for construction provision types: defect liability provisions, onerous fixed-price contract provisions with cost overrun analysis, liquidated damages, subcontractor claims, and site environmental remediation.

IAS 37 · LIVEv2026.04Legal Claim

Provision recognition, documented.
Not just calculated.

Session
0xAAF0
Reporting Date
FY 2026
Probability
75%
provision.conf
recognition.conf
ias37.md
01// engagement— IAS 37.84
02entity_name=
03reporting_date=
04currency=
06// obligation_type— IAS 37.10
07obligation.type=
09// recognition_criteria— IAS 37.14
10obligation_exists=
11probability_pct=% · >50% = probable
✓ probable threshold met (IAS 37.23)
12can_reliably_estimate=
Three-criteria checklist (IAS 37.14 — all must be met):
13
14
15
Three-criteria recognition checklist (IAS 37.14)
16// measurement— IAS 37.36-47
17method=
18best_estimate=€
20best_estimate.rationale=
Best-estimate rationale (IAS 37.36-40)
24// risk_uncertainty_adjustment— IAS 37.42-44
Risk & uncertainty considerations (IAS 37.42-44):
25
26
27
28
29
31risk_adj.rationale=
Risk & uncertainty adjustment (IAS 37.42-44)
34// discounting— IAS 37.45-47
35expected_timing_years=years
36pre_tax_rate=%
Rate derivation factors (IAS 37.47):
37
38
39
40
41
43discount.rationale=
Discounting · rate + rationale + unwinding (IAS 37.45-47 · 60)
48// reimbursement_rights— IAS 37.53-58
49virtually_certain=
recognition threshold
No reimbursement right that meets the 'virtually certain' threshold (IAS 37.53).
Reimbursement rights (IAS 37.53-58)
66// onerous_contract— IAS 37.66-69
67contract_revenue=€
68cost_of_fulfilling=€
69termination_penalty=€ · if terminate
Enter revenue + fulfilment cost to assess.
Onerous contract assessment (IAS 37.66-69)
74// prior_year_movement— IAS 37.84 · ISA 540
75prior_year_provision=€ · closing
76entity_revenue=€ · for benchmark
77total_liabilities=€
78materiality=€
Prior-year movement + benchmarks (ISA 540)
82// ias_12_deferred_tax— IAS 12.24
83tax_rate=%
Recognise DTA only to the extent that sufficient taxable profit is available (IAS 12.24).
IAS 12 deferred tax (IAS 12.24)
88// risk_warnings— rule engine · ISA 540
✓ No risk warnings raised.
Risk warnings · 8-rule engine (ISA 540)
92// disclosure_and_conclusion— IAS 37.84-92
Tick disclosure items addressed in FS note:
93IAS 37.84(a)
94IAS 37.84(b)
95IAS 37.84(c)
96IAS 37.84(d)
97IAS 37.84(e)
98IAS 37.85(a)
99IAS 37.85(a)
100IAS 37.85(b)
101IAS 37.85(c)
102IAS 37.86
103IAS 37.89
104IAS 37.92
99conclusion.narrative=
Disclosure checklist + conclusion (IAS 37.84-92)
recognize·—€·Ctrl+E
previewwp-ias37-2026.pdf
🔒 LOCKED
IAS 37 working paper preview
Meet all three recognition criteria and enter a measurement amount to see your IAS 37 working paper render.
PROVISION
—
enter amount
PRIMARY
CLASSIFICATION
RECOGNIZE
IAS 37.14
PROBABILITY
75%
probable
METHOD
Best Est.
IAS 37.40
EXPORT (EMAIL TO UNLOCK)

Email unlocks the free download.

No payment required. Unlock above to download the full working paper.

Format
HTML → PDF
Pages
6–10
Price
FREE
or CtrlE

IAS 37 provisions in Construction

Construction companies carry provision portfolios driven by the inherent risks of complex, long-duration projects: defect liability obligations, onerous contract provisions when cost overruns exceed bid margins, liquidated damages for project delays, and environmental obligations from site contamination. Construction defect provisions are a near-universal obligation, recognised when a project reaches practical completion and the defect liability period begins. For large contractors with portfolios of completed projects, the expected value method provides the most reliable measurement, weighted by historical defect data segmented by project type, construction method, and defect category. Onerous contract provisions are critically important for construction companies because fixed-price contracts — the dominant contracting model — expose contractors to the full risk of cost overruns. When estimated total costs exceed contracted revenue, the loss must be immediately provisioned regardless of the project's completion stage.

Measurement considerations for Construction

Onerous contract provisions for construction require precise estimation of the total cost to complete. The May 2020 IAS 37 amendment expanded what constitutes 'costs of fulfilling' to include not just incremental costs but also an allocation of other costs that relate directly to fulfilling the contract. For construction, this means direct labour, materials, subcontractor costs (incremental) plus site supervision, project management, quality assurance, and equipment depreciation (allocated directly related costs) are all included. The provision equals the total expected loss on the contract (costs minus revenue). This provision is distinct from the IFRS 15 revenue recognition calculations — it is an additional charge recognised immediately when the contract becomes onerous. Liquidated damages provisions should be measured at the contractual rate applied to the expected delay period, adjusted for the probability of achieving contractual extensions of time.

Regulatory context and audit considerations

Construction defect liability periods vary by jurisdiction: typically 12-24 months for general defects, with extended periods (6-10 years) for structural defects in many civil law jurisdictions. National building codes create statutory obligations that exist independently of contractual warranty terms. Health and safety legislation (EU Framework Directive 89/391/EEC and national implementation) creates obligations for construction site safety that can give rise to penalty provisions. Auditors should evaluate whether construction companies have identified all projects where costs to complete exceed remaining revenue, particularly in periods of construction cost inflation, supply chain disruption, or labour shortages.

Common provision types in Construction

construction defect

Defect liability provisions for completed projects — structural, waterproofing, mechanical/electrical defects during warranty periods

Typical: 1-3% of contract value Timeline: 12-24 months (defect liability period) Method: Expected Value
onerous contract

Fixed-price construction contracts where cost overruns have made the contract loss-making

Typical: Estimated total loss on contract Timeline: Remaining contract duration Method: Best Estimate
legal claim

Liquidated damages claims from clients for late delivery, subcontractor claims, professional negligence

Typical: Contractual LD rate × delay period Timeline: 1-5 years Method: Best Estimate
environmental

Site contamination remediation, demolition waste disposal, hazardous material removal

Typical: €100K-€10M Timeline: 1-10 years Method: Best Estimate
regulatory penalty

Health and safety violations, building code non-compliance, environmental breaches during construction

Typical: €10K-€5M Timeline: 1-3 years Method: Best Estimate

Worked example: Atlas Construction Group NV

Atlas has a fixed-price contract for a commercial office building with contract revenue of €18,000,000. At the reporting date, the project is 60% complete but cost overruns have made the contract onerous:

Total contract revenue: €18,000,000. Total estimated cost: €19,800,000 (including incremental costs of €17,200,000 and allocated directly related costs of €2,600,000 per May 2020 amendment). Total expected loss: €19,800,000 - €18,000,000 = €1,800,000. This loss must be recognised immediately as an onerous contract provision, regardless of the project's 60% completion stage. The provision covers the total contract loss, not just the loss on the uncompleted portion.

Provision Amount
€1.800.000
Regulatory Context: National building codes create statutory defect liability obligations independent of contractual terms. The May 2020 IAS 37 amendment on costs of fulfilling onerous contracts has particular significance for construction. Health and safety legislation creates penalty exposure for construction site incidents.

Frequently asked questions: Construction

When should a construction contract be recognised as onerous under IAS 37?
A construction contract becomes onerous when the unavoidable costs of meeting the contractual obligations exceed the expected economic benefits (contract revenue). The 'costs of fulfilling' include both incremental costs (materials, direct labour, subcontractors) and an allocation of directly related costs (site supervision, project management, quality assurance, equipment depreciation) per the May 2020 IAS 37 amendment. The total expected loss must be provisioned immediately when identified, regardless of the project's completion stage.
How should construction defect provisions be calculated?
For contractors with portfolios of completed projects, use the expected value method (IAS 37.39). Segment historical defect data by project type, construction method, and defect category (structural, waterproofing, M&E, finishes). Weight each outcome by its probability and aggregate across the portfolio of projects in their defect liability period. For individual large projects, specific assessment based on known defects, building surveys, and expert reports is more appropriate.
What is the impact of the May 2020 IAS 37 amendment on construction companies?
The May 2020 amendment to IAS 37 significantly affected construction companies by expanding the definition of 'costs of fulfilling' an onerous contract. Previously, some entities used only incremental costs (materials, direct labour), which produced a lower fulfillment cost and triggered fewer onerous contract provisions. The amendment clarified that directly related costs (site management, quality control, equipment depreciation) must also be included. This means more construction contracts may be identified as onerous, and onerous contract provisions will be larger.
How should liquidated damages provisions be measured for construction delays?
Liquidated damages provisions should be measured at the contractual LD rate multiplied by the expected delay period. Assess the probability of achieving extensions of time (EOT) that would reduce or eliminate LD exposure. If an EOT claim is probable (>50%), the provision should reflect the reduced delay period. Consider whether the LD clause is enforceable under the applicable law — some jurisdictions allow courts to reduce disproportionate LDs (penalty clauses). Include the costs of acceleration measures if these are being implemented to mitigate delay.
How should subcontractor claims be provisioned in construction?
Subcontractor claims against the main contractor should be assessed individually. Common claims include: additional costs for scope changes, delay and disruption claims, unpaid variation orders, and defect rectification disputes. Each claim should be assessed for probability (is an outflow more likely than not?) and amount (what is the best estimate of the expected payment?). For main contractors defending against subcontractor claims, the obligation is assessed from the contractor's perspective — even if the contractor intends to pass the claim to the client, the contractor's direct obligation to the subcontractor may create a provision.

Other industry calculators

General (Hub) Manufacturing Retail Banking Insurance Real Estate Healthcare Technology Energy Nonprofits Government Transportation Hospitality Agriculture

Related audit tools

IFRS 9 ECL Calculator IFRS 16 Lease Calculator Going Concern Checklist Materiality Calculator

Further reading

Get practical audit insights, weekly.

No exam theory. Just what makes audits run faster.

290+ guides published20 free toolsBuilt by practicing auditors

No spam. We’re auditors, not marketers.