IAS 37 · Agriculture

IAS 37 Provision Calculator
for Agriculture

Pre-configured for agriculture provision types: environmental remediation for pesticide contamination and water pollution, decommissioning of farm structures and irrigation systems, onerous forward crop contracts, and livestock disease compensation obligations.

IAS 37 · LIVEv2026.04Legal Claim

Provision recognition, documented.
Not just calculated.

Session
0x826E
Reporting Date
FY 2026
Probability
75%
provision.conf
recognition.conf
ias37.md
01// engagement— IAS 37.84
02entity_name=
03reporting_date=
04currency=
06// obligation_type— IAS 37.10
07obligation.type=
09// recognition_criteria— IAS 37.14
10obligation_exists=
11probability_pct=% · >50% = probable
✓ probable threshold met (IAS 37.23)
12can_reliably_estimate=
Three-criteria checklist (IAS 37.14 — all must be met):
13
14
15
Three-criteria recognition checklist (IAS 37.14)
16// measurement— IAS 37.36-47
17method=
18best_estimate=
20best_estimate.rationale=
Best-estimate rationale (IAS 37.36-40)
24// risk_uncertainty_adjustment— IAS 37.42-44
Risk & uncertainty considerations (IAS 37.42-44):
25
26
27
28
29
31risk_adj.rationale=
Risk & uncertainty adjustment (IAS 37.42-44)
34// discounting— IAS 37.45-47
35expected_timing_years=years
36pre_tax_rate=%
Rate derivation factors (IAS 37.47):
37
38
39
40
41
43discount.rationale=
Discounting · rate + rationale + unwinding (IAS 37.45-47 · 60)
48// reimbursement_rights— IAS 37.53-58
49virtually_certain=
recognition threshold
No reimbursement right that meets the 'virtually certain' threshold (IAS 37.53).
Reimbursement rights (IAS 37.53-58)
66// onerous_contract— IAS 37.66-69
67contract_revenue=
68cost_of_fulfilling=
69termination_penalty=€ · if terminate
Enter revenue + fulfilment cost to assess.
Onerous contract assessment (IAS 37.66-69)
74// prior_year_movement— IAS 37.84 · ISA 540
75prior_year_provision=€ · closing
76entity_revenue=€ · for benchmark
77total_liabilities=
78materiality=
Prior-year movement + benchmarks (ISA 540)
82// ias_12_deferred_tax— IAS 12.24
83tax_rate=%
Recognise DTA only to the extent that sufficient taxable profit is available (IAS 12.24).
IAS 12 deferred tax (IAS 12.24)
88// risk_warnings— rule engine · ISA 540
✓ No risk warnings raised.
Risk warnings · 8-rule engine (ISA 540)
92// disclosure_and_conclusion— IAS 37.84-92
Tick disclosure items addressed in FS note:
93IAS 37.84(a)
94IAS 37.84(b)
95IAS 37.84(c)
96IAS 37.84(d)
97IAS 37.84(e)
98IAS 37.85(a)
99IAS 37.85(a)
100IAS 37.85(b)
101IAS 37.85(c)
102IAS 37.86
103IAS 37.89
104IAS 37.92
99conclusion.narrative=
Disclosure checklist + conclusion (IAS 37.84-92)
recognize··Ctrl+E
previewwp-ias37-2026.pdf
🔒 LOCKED
IAS 37 working paper preview
Meet all three recognition criteria and enter a measurement amount to see your IAS 37 working paper render.
PROVISION
enter amount
PRIMARY
CLASSIFICATION
RECOGNIZE
IAS 37.14
PROBABILITY
75%
probable
METHOD
Best Est.
IAS 37.40
EXPORT (EMAIL TO UNLOCK)

Email unlocks the free download.

No payment required. Unlock above to download the full working paper.

Format
HTML → PDF
Pages
6–10
Price
FREE
or CtrlE
Scope Note: Biological asset measurement is under IAS 41, not IAS 37. Provisions related to biological asset obligations (e.g., costs to sell, disposal of diseased animals) should be measured under IAS 37 where they meet the recognition criteria.

IAS 37 provisions in Agriculture

Agricultural entities face a provision landscape shaped by environmental regulation, weather and disease uncertainty, and the volatile commodity markets that affect forward contract profitability. Environmental remediation provisions are becoming increasingly significant for agriculture as environmental standards tighten: pesticide contamination of soil and groundwater, nitrogen emissions into waterways, and habitat destruction all create legal obligations under evolving environmental legislation. The EU's Green Deal and Farm to Fork Strategy are accelerating this trend. Decommissioning provisions for agricultural structures — greenhouses, intensive livestock buildings, irrigation infrastructure, and storage facilities — are often long-term obligations that require discounting. Onerous forward crop contracts arise when market price movements make pre-sold harvests loss-making, and livestock disease outbreaks can create compensation obligations where agricultural entities are liable for biosecurity failures.

Measurement considerations for Agriculture

Environmental provisions for agriculture require specialist environmental assessment to estimate remediation costs. Soil contamination from decades of pesticide use may require excavation, treatment, and monitoring over many years. Water pollution from nitrogen and phosphorus runoff may require installation of buffer zones, treatment systems, and ongoing monitoring. The provision should be measured at the best estimate of total remediation cost, discounted to present value for long-term programmes. Onerous forward crop contract provisions compare the expected revenue under the contract (contracted price × expected yield) with the unavoidable costs of fulfilling the contract (planting, cultivation, harvest, and delivery costs). If the costs exceed the contracted revenue, the difference is provisioned. For livestock disease, provisions arise when an entity has a legal obligation to compensate for disease transmission or to cull and dispose of affected animals.

Regulatory context and audit considerations

Agricultural environmental regulation varies significantly by jurisdiction. In the EU, the Nitrates Directive, Water Framework Directive, and Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) cross-compliance requirements create legal obligations that may give rise to provisions. In the Netherlands, nitrogen regulation (stikstofbeleid) has become particularly significant, with some agricultural operations required to reduce emissions or face penalties. National plant protection product regulations create obligations for remediation of contamination from banned or restricted pesticides. Auditors should evaluate whether agricultural entities have identified all environmental obligations arising from current and historical farming practices.

Common provision types in Agriculture

environmental

Pesticide contamination remediation, water pollution, soil degradation — increasingly regulated with stricter environmental standards

Typical: €50K-€5M Timeline: 2-15 years Method: Best Estimate
asset retirement

Decommissioning of farm structures, greenhouses, irrigation systems, storage facilities at end of life or lease end

Typical: €20K-€2M Timeline: 5-20 years Method: Best Estimate
onerous contract

Forward crop contracts at unfavourable prices when market prices have fallen below contracted selling prices, or input costs have risen

Typical: Contract loss amount Timeline: Growing season to harvest Method: Best Estimate
regulatory penalty

Environmental regulation violations — nitrogen emissions (EU), water usage restrictions, pesticide usage breaches

Typical: €10K-€1M Timeline: 1-3 years Method: Best Estimate
legal claim

Livestock disease compensation obligations, crop contamination claims from neighbouring properties, employment disputes

Typical: €10K-€500K Timeline: 1-5 years Method: Best Estimate

Worked example: AgriVerde Cooperative

An agricultural cooperative must remediate groundwater contamination from historical pesticide use on a 200-hectare former arable site. Environmental assessment indicates a 10-year remediation programme:

Nominal remediation cost: €1,800,000 (based on environmental engineering assessment). Timing: 10-year programme, weighted average timing of 5 years. Discount rate: 3.0%. Present value = €1,800,000 / (1.03)^5 = €1,800,000 / 1.1593 = €1,552,700. Year 1 unwinding: €1,552,700 × 3.0% = €46,581. The provision is recognised against the cost of the land under IAS 16.16(c) if the contamination arises from acquisition of the site, or through profit and loss if from the entity's own operations.

Provision Amount
€1.552.700
Regulatory Context: EU Nitrates Directive, Water Framework Directive, and CAP cross-compliance create environmental obligations. National pesticide regulations affect remediation provisions. Livestock biosecurity regulations create disease-related obligations. The EU Green Deal and Farm to Fork Strategy are tightening agricultural environmental standards.

Frequently asked questions: Agriculture

How should pesticide contamination provisions be measured for agricultural entities?
Pesticide contamination provisions should be based on specialist environmental assessments that estimate the extent of contamination (soil and groundwater testing), the required remediation method (excavation, bioremediation, pump-and-treat for groundwater), the expected timeline, and monitoring costs. The provision should include direct remediation costs, professional fees for environmental consultants, regulatory compliance costs, and any third-party claims from neighbouring properties or water users. Long-term programmes should be discounted to present value.
When do forward crop contracts become onerous for agricultural entities?
Forward crop contracts become onerous when the unavoidable costs of fulfilling the contract (planting, cultivation, harvest, transport, and allocated directly related costs) exceed the expected revenue at the contracted price. This can occur when: input costs (fertiliser, fuel, labour) have risen significantly, expected yields have declined due to weather or disease, or contracted selling prices are below current market prices and the contract cannot be renegotiated. The provision equals the lower of the fulfillment loss and the termination penalty.
How does EU nitrogen regulation affect agricultural provisions?
EU nitrogen regulation, implemented through the Nitrates Directive and national legislation (such as the Netherlands' stikstofbeleid), can create IAS 37 provisions in several ways: penalties for exceeding emission limits, costs of implementing required emission reduction measures, and potential costs of reducing livestock numbers to comply with regulations. Where an agricultural entity has exceeded permitted levels and a penalty is probable, a provision should be recognised. Where future compliance costs are legally mandated and unavoidable, they may create provisions when specific regulatory deadlines are established.
Should agricultural entities provision for livestock disease outbreaks?
Provisions for livestock disease should be recognised when an entity has a legal or constructive obligation arising from a disease event. This may include: mandatory culling and disposal costs (where not covered by government compensation schemes), compensation to neighbouring properties affected by disease transmission, and costs of biosecurity measures required by regulators. Government compensation for culled animals is a reimbursement that can only be recognised as a separate asset when receipt is virtually certain (IAS 37.53).
How should decommissioning provisions for greenhouses and farm structures be treated?
Decommissioning provisions for agricultural structures should be recognised when a legal or constructive obligation to remove or restore exists — typically from lease terms, planning conditions, or environmental regulations. The provision is measured at the best estimate of removal and restoration costs, discounted to present value for long remaining lifetimes. The corresponding debit is to the asset's cost under IAS 16.16(c). For structures on leased agricultural land, the provision forms part of the right-of-use asset under IFRS 16.

Get practical audit insights, weekly.

No exam theory. Just what makes audits run faster.

290+ guides published20 free toolsBuilt by practicing auditors

No spam. We’re auditors, not marketers.