IAS 36 · Insurance

Impairment Calculator
for Insurance

Calculate value in use for acquired insurance portfolios, distribution network assets, and goodwill from insurance M&A transactions. Designed for the long-tail asset profiles in mid-market insurance entities.

IAS 36 · LIVEv2026.04DCF

Impairment testing, audit-ready.
Not just calculated.

Session
0x2904
Period
FY 2026
Rate
inputs.conf
dcf.model
README.md
01// engagement— IAS 36.126
02entity_name=
03cgu_name=
04reporting_period=
07// asset— IAS 36.6 · .80-81
08carrying_amount=
CGU / goodwill allocation — tick any met (IAS 36.80-81):
10
11
12
13
14
16cgu.rationale=
CGU + goodwill allocation rationale (IAS 36.80-81)
18// discount_model— IAS 36.55-57
19pre_tax_discount_rate=%
20terminal_growth_rate=%
21forecast_years=
IAS 36.33
Rate derivation factors (IAS 36.55-57 / A17-A21):
23
24
25
26
27
29rate.rationale=
Discount rate derivation · WACC + gross-up (IAS 36.55-57)
32// cash_flows— IAS 36.33-38 · net
33cf_year_1=
34cf_year_2=
35cf_year_3=
36cf_year_4=
37cf_year_5=
40// cash_flow_basis— IAS 36.33-38 · forecast rigour
Forecast basis complies with (tick each confirmed):
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48forecast.rationale=
Cash flow forecast basis (IAS 36.33-38)
52// impairment_indicators— IAS 36.12
External sources
53IAS 36.12(a)
54IAS 36.12(b)
55IAS 36.12(c)
56IAS 36.12(d)
Internal sources
57IAS 36.12(e)
58IAS 36.12(f)
59IAS 36.12(g)
60indicators.narrative=
Impairment indicators · external + internal (IAS 36.12)
64// fvlcd— IAS 36.18-19 · IFRS 13
65fvlcd_mode=
66fvlcd_amount=
67fair_value_level=
68fvlcd.rationale=
FVLCD · IAS 36.18-19 + IFRS 13 hierarchy
72// prior_year_comparison— year-on-year VIU trend
73prior_year_viu=
Enter prior year VIU to see year-on-year trend.
Prior year VIU comparison · trend
76// sensitivity_analysis— IAS 36.134(f) · rate × growth
Enter DCF inputs to compute the sensitivity grid.
Sensitivity analysis · rate × growth grid (IAS 36.134(f))
82// risk_warnings— rule engine · ISA 540
Enter DCF inputs to run risk analysis.
Risk warnings · 7-rule engine (ISA 540)
88// disclosure_and_conclusion— IAS 36.126-134
Tick disclosure items addressed in FS note:
89IAS 36.126
90IAS 36.130(a)
91IAS 36.130(b)
92IAS 36.130(c)-(d)
93IAS 36.130(e)
94IAS 36.130(g)
95IAS 36.134(a)
96IAS 36.134(d)(i)-(ii)
97IAS 36.134(d)(iv)
98IAS 36.134(f)
99IAS 36.130(f)
99conclusion.narrative=
Disclosure checklist + conclusion (IAS 36.126-134)
awaiting input·0/11 fields · 0 errorsEUR·DCF · 5yr
previewias36-wp-cgu-2026.pdf
🔒 LOCKED
IAS 36 working paper preview
Enter carrying amount, discount rate, and cash flows to see your IAS 36 working paper render in real time.
Value in Use
Awaiting input
TOTAL
Recoverable Amount
max(VIU, FVLCD)
Headroom
RA − carrying amount
Breakeven Rate
Rate where VIU = CA
EXPORT (EMAIL TO UNLOCK)

Email unlocks the free download.

No payment required. Unlock above to download the full working paper.

Format
HTML → PDF
Pages
6–10
Price
FREE
or CtrlE

IAS 36 impairment testing for Insurance

Insurance entities have undergone a major reporting shift with IFRS 17's implementation, but IAS 36 remains fully relevant for non-financial assets. Goodwill from acquiring insurance books or broking businesses, customer relationship intangibles (broker networks, renewal rights), IT platforms (policy administration systems, claims management software), and office infrastructure all sit within IAS 36's scope. IFRS 17 handles the insurance contracts themselves, much as IFRS 9 handles financial instruments for banks. What's left under IAS 36 is the operational infrastructure of the insurance business. For a mid-market insurer or insurance intermediary that has grown through acquisition, goodwill and intangible assets can represent 20% to 40% of total assets.

IAS 36 testing for insurance entities requires careful separation of what IFRS 17 covers and what IAS 36 covers. The cash flows in a VIU model should reflect the entity's profit from servicing insurance contracts (the contractual service margin release, variable fee income, and investment returns on insurance float), not the insurance liabilities themselves. This is conceptually similar to banking, where the lending book's credit risk sits under IFRS 9 while the bank's infrastructure sits under IAS 36. The discount rate for an insurance CGU should reflect the specific risks of the business unit. A life insurance division with long-tail liabilities and stable premium income carries different risk from a property catastrophe reinsurer with volatile claims patterns. European mid-market insurers typically apply pre-tax WACCs between 8.5% and 12.0%. The forecast period for insurance CGUs can justifiably extend beyond five years when the business has long-duration contracts: a life insurer with a back book running off over 20 years might use a longer explicit forecast to capture the run-off profile.

Regulators have paid close attention to insurance goodwill impairment. EIOPA's peer review on supervisory practices found that several national regulators were not adequately challenging insurers' impairment testing. The PRA in the UK has noted that some insurers use discount rates that don't reflect current market conditions, instead relying on rates set at the time of acquisition. IAS 36.55 requires a current rate, not a historical one. Another common finding is that insurers performing annual goodwill tests rely on embedded value calculations that were prepared for a different purpose (regulatory solvency) and may not align with IAS 36's specific requirements. Embedded value uses different discount rates, different projection assumptions, and includes items (such as the value of future new business) that IAS 36.44 arguably excludes from VIU.

When using this calculator for insurance CGUs, input the carrying amount of operational assets and allocated goodwill. Exclude insurance contract assets and liabilities (these sit under IFRS 17). For the discount rate, use a pre-tax rate reflecting the CGU's risk. Life insurance CGUs typically sit at the lower end of the range (8.5% to 10.0%) while general insurance and reinsurance CGUs with more volatile earnings sit higher (10.0% to 12.0%). Terminal growth should reflect long-term premium growth in the entity's market. Consider extending the forecast period to seven or ten years for life insurance CGUs with long-tail business, as the five-year default may not capture the full value of in-force business running off over decades.

Frequently asked questions: Insurance

Which insurance assets fall within IAS 36's scope after IFRS 17 adoption?
All non-financial, non-insurance-contract assets. This includes goodwill, customer relationships (broker networks, renewal rights), capitalised IT systems, office property and equipment, and ROU assets. Insurance contracts and associated assets/liabilities sit under IFRS 17. Financial assets sit under IFRS 9. Everything else goes to IAS 36.
Can an insurer use its embedded value model for IAS 36 impairment testing?
Not directly. Embedded value models use post-tax discount rates, include the value of future new business, and apply different projection bases than IAS 36 requires. An insurer can start from the embedded value and adjust: remove value of new business (IAS 36 VIU reflects existing business only), convert the discount rate to pre-tax, and ensure cash flow projections exclude items prohibited by IAS 36.44. Document each adjustment clearly.
What forecast period is appropriate for a life insurance CGU?
IAS 36.33 defaults to five years but permits longer periods with justification. A life insurer with a back book of 20-year policies can justify a longer explicit forecast because the cash flow pattern is contractually defined and historically predictable. Seven to ten years is common in practice, with a terminal value capturing the remaining tail. The entity must demonstrate its ability to forecast accurately over the chosen period.
How should an insurance intermediary test goodwill from acquiring a broking business?
Allocate goodwill to the acquired broking CGU per IAS 36.80. Build a VIU model based on projected commission and fee income from the existing client book, applying a retention rate assumption. The discount rate should reflect the intermediary's specific risk (client concentration, regulatory risk, competition from direct channels). A broker with 90% client retention and diversified lines carries lower risk than one with 70% retention concentrated in one product line.

Related industry calculators

General Calculator

Get practical audit insights, weekly.

No exam theory. Just what makes audits run faster.

290+ guides published20 free toolsBuilt by practicing auditors

No spam. We’re auditors, not marketers.